PayPal: Safari Not Among 'Unsafe Browsers'
Woke up this morning and found this statement from a PayPal spokesperson: "PayPal is developing features to block customers from logging into PayPal when using obsolete browsers on outdated or unsupported operating systems. An example of such a browser/OS combination might be, for example, Internet Explorer 4 running on Windows 98. We have absolutely no intention of blocking current versions of any browsers, including Apple's Safari, from our website." To be fair, the PayPal whitepaper (.pdf) never mentioned Safari but, by a process of elimination (Safari does not support EV-SSL certificates), it seemed logical to assume that Apple's browser would fall into PayPal's "unsafe" category. (See Techmeme discussion). PayPal must be commended for taking steps to enforce security standards for financial transactions but, as Gartner's John Pescatore pointed out in an e-mail conversation, the company is looking in the wrong area:
PayPal offers the security key for a non-refundable $5 (shipping included). Yankee Group's Andrew Jaquith suggests that SSBs (single-site browsers) could be useful to help secure Web-based financial transactions. Look out for my story next week on Jaquith's proposal. |

Over on Twitter, during a discussion on
Comments (1)
I've written this up for another venue and I drew the same conclusion as you. The PayPal paper gives every indication that Safari is an unsafe browser by their definition. If we continue to interpret their actions based on what they say, they're being inconsistant.
Posted by Larry Seltzer | April 20, 2008 8:22 AM