eWeek Security Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
March 19, 2008 11:24 AM

Hannaford Data Breach: The Security Vendor Conundrum



Hannaford Data Breach: The Security Vendor Conundrum Whenever a news story breaks about a major data breach, PR folks representing security vendors trip over themselves to clog my inbox with "our-solution-could-have-prevented-that" notes.

For Rapid7, a company that hawks vulnerability assessment, PCI compliance and Web application scanning software, this week's Hannaford breach flipped the script and showed how security vendors scramble to deal with a potential embarrassment.

Rapid7, as it turns out, handled vulnerability scanning and point-of-sale inspections for Hannaford.

Here's a snippet from an August 2006 press release (.pdf):

BOSTON - August 15, 2006 - Rapid7 today announced that the Hannaford Bros. Co. has purchased NeXpose, its award-winning enterprise vulnerability management solution, to perform network security scanning in compliance with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard.

NeXpose will be used to scan devices in Hannaford's networks and at point-of-sale in its 158 retail supermarkets and food and drug stores, ensuring the protection of customers' credit card data and other information. Rapid7 is a MasterCard-approved security scanning vendor as part of the MasterCard Site Data Protection (SDP) Program.

As Hannaford explained in its FAQ on the breach (we don't know yet how the breach occurred), the stolen data was accessed from Hannaford's computer systems during the card verification transmission process in transactions.

Funny enough, the folks at Attrition.org caught Rapid7 trying to wipe all references to Hannaford from its Web site.

Hannaford was removed from Rapid7's page listing customers and the PDF file linked above also disappeared. At midnight last night, I was able to use Google's cache to confirm Attrition.org's findings.

This morning, Hannaford suddenly reappeared on Rapid7's site with this note:

While Hannaford Brothers have confirmed that a recent breach resulted in the theft of sensitive data, Hannaford has also confirmed that NeXpose continues to provide exceptional vulnerability management and outstanding remediation reporting and that no systems within the NeXpose scan network contributed to the loss of data. Visit www.rapid7.com today to understand how NeXpose can be used to provide advanced protection against unauthorized data access.

It appears that someone got wind of the Attrition.org expose and is trying hard to salvage the situation.

This episode underscores the conundrum faced by aggressive marketers (and PR types) when trying to hype a product's capabilities, especially in the computer/network security space.

Instead of being honest about the realities, marketers offer silver bullets. We've all seen these ridiculous promises -- Total Protection (McAfee), Hacker Safe (McAfee, again), blocks all types of threats (Panda).

Last week, at the SourceBoston conference, this was an issue discussed brilliantly by Yankee Group's Andrew Jaquith, who pleaded with marketers to stop with the outlandish promises.

It won't end, of course. But, as Rapid7 found out, it can be a major embarrassment.

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://securitywatch.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/13053

Comments (4)

B :

It is not uncommon for a vendor to remove clients from their list of customers, especially when the project ran into problems and was canceled. The Trilogy site no longer lists IBM, which was one of their flagship accounts back when first signed, years ago. But the IBM implementation ran into difficulties, so Trilogy dropped the mention from their site.

Michael D. Houst :

Sounds to me that customers of Hannaford need to include Rapid7 in their class action suit against them for failure to secure their financial data.

As for Rapid7 and their obviously unethical behavior, I would recommend every company currently using them dump them for a better vendor; and all stock holders (if any) to pull their funds from them.

alerter :

You have to wonder whether or not Rapid7's EULA attempts to absolve it of any/all liability, as is SOP for software in general.

If/when it is eventually determined that flaws/defects/oversights in R7's "solution," including *gaps & seams* pertinent to other Hannaford infrastucture known, at the time of implementation, to be critical, played a role in the data loss and/or failures to detect it a heck of a lot sooner, will R7 be compelled to make anyone whole???

I have to hope so.


Man-E-Faces :

Unfortunately, many of our largest Fortune ### companies will continue to opt for cookie-cutter product based solution instead of listening to what is not a true cliche by Bruce Schneir stating that solutions to problems with information security is one that cannot be solved solely with product based solutions but rather one fueled by evolving security processes.

Post a Comment

 
 


RSS Syndication
Advertisement
Advertisement
Security Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise

Ziff Davis Enterprise Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters
RSS Feeds | White Papers | ROI Calculators | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video |

Baseline | Careers | Channel Insider | CIO Insight | DesktopLinux | DeviceForge | DevSource | eSeminars |
eWEEK | LinuxDevices | Linux Watch | Microsoft Watch | Mid-market | Networking | PDF Zone |
Publish | eWeek Security | Strategic Partner | Web Buyer's Guide | Windows for Devices

Developer Shed | Dev Shed | ASP Free | Dev Articles | Dev Hardware | SEO Chat | Tutorialized | Scripts |
Code Walkers | Web Hosters | Dev Mechanic | Dev Archives | IT Marketplace | igrep

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Copyright ©1996-2007 Ziff Davis Enterprise, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Security Watch is a trademark of Ziff Davis Enterprise, Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Enterprise Inc. is prohibited.

Ziff Davis Enterprise