More Mobile Malware Models Evolving
While researchers have long predicted an impending onslaught of malware programs designed to attack mobile devices, examples of such programs observed in the wild have proven rather few and far between. There have been some notable instances of the attacks, such as with the Cabir Bluetooth-borne worm virus that targets Symbian smartphones, but for the most part there have not been many mobile-specific threats that have had packed a noticeable punch. However, in a recent blog post offered up by researchers at AV giant Trend Micro, experts have pointed to the potential for some of the relatively low-level threats that have been appearing more recently to boost the potential for wreaking havoc on handhelds. In particular, the researchers said that attackers are aiming their efforts at mobile users that are accessing the Web with their devices. "With more users using mobile devices that are Web-enabled, malware authors are also quick to adapt. From spam to ransomware, cyber-criminals are exploiting mobile phone usage as a new avenue for profit," writes Jake Soriano, a communications specialist with Trend's research group. "Interestingly, this malicious software deviates from the usual scheming operations that use Symbian malware to extort money from affected users." Highlighting the work of colleague Jamz Yaneza, the blog specifically points to the appearance of WINCE_CRYPTIC.A, a malware variant that targets Windows Mobile phones and plays on vulnerabilities in the Microsoft WinCE embedded operating system. "Typical viruses infect files themselves but WINCE_CRYPTIC.A does not. Instead, it creates "companion" files using the same file names as the infected mobile phone's storage card," the expert writes. "These companion files contain the infection code, and when users run the storage card, the malicious files run first." As a result of its design, WINCE_CRYPTICA does not infect files itself, theoretically making it harder to find, and the changes that its companion file carries out are made from the polymorphic engine of the malware, trend reports. The attack could also be classified as a Trojan, the experts contend, based on its hidden infection capabilities. "Users are tricked into thinking they are still running a legitimate application when in fact they are already executing the malware," the researchers said. An additional offspring of being infected with the attack is that affected devices will have their text and background colors altered, essentially blacking out their screens. According to Trend, the most likely methods for delivery of the threat are infected memory cards and malicious Web sites/downloads. Yaneza contends that document-sharing via infrared or Bluetooth systems could be another potential delivery method. The big picture message is that even though sizeable waves of mobile attacks have yet to appear as once predicted, the threats out there are slowly being developed into more destructive beasts, the researchers said. "WinCE malware in the past did not have this routine," writes Soriano. "Our researchers believe that creators of this new WinCE malware are testing the waters for a bigger threat on mobile devices."
|


Comments (2)
I agree with Jake Soriano’s view that malware hackers are “testing the waters” for a bigger threat on mobile devices. This potential threat is a critical issue for enterprise IT departments which are increasingly supporting mobile devices across their organizations because they are proven to improve productivity.
Interestingly, about a month ago Dexterra briefed a well-known security analyst who described as “overkill” the two factor authentication security precautions we created for mobile devices in the enterprise. His rationale was similar to what you wrote in your opening paragraph, that despite all the hype about mobile security, there just haven’t been that many attacks. I’m curious as to when he thinks it becomes okay to be concerned about vulnerabilities on mobile devices such as smartphones. Just imagine the conversation as a CIO of a bank or securities brokerage explains to the CEO on the day the company is hit by the first big mobile malware attack that he didn’t deploy a mobile security solution because it seemed like overkill given the lack malware attacks up to that point.
Security has long been the oxygen issue in enterprise IT systems; if it isn’t secure then it isn’t ready for the enterprise. No IT manager thinks it’s okay risk harm to data or devices simply because there has only been a few malware attacks, or the attacks up to now haven’t been that malicious. There are mobile security precautions that can be taken, and enterprises must use them and stay on guard. We may not know the form of the first malware attack to truly harm the enterprise, but we can be reasonably sure someone, somewhere is working on it right now.
Posted by Benjamin Wesson | November 25, 2008 2:38 PM
It seems to me that there are some pretty significant diminishing returns when it comes to using malware on cell phones. Computers are so much easier to target and are much more likely to have valuable data on them. It seems that hacking cell phones would be good for spreading misery, but little else.
Posted by Petra | January 26, 2010 9:41 AM