eWeek Security Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
January 9, 2008 10:48 AM

Secunia Patch Data Paints Startling Picture



secunia_logo.png Here's a frightening statistic taken from Secunia's PSI (Personal Software Inspector), a free patch-management utility you should already be using:

A whopping 95 percent of the last 20,000 newly registered PSI users are running computers that haven't been fully patched/updated.

Secunia, which collects data from computers scanned by the PSI, found that a mere 5 percent have patched all applications and more than 40 percent have 11 or more insecure applications installed.

Over the last seven days, the utility scanned 20,009 machines from new users, matching its security patch database against 1,788,832 applications.

The data underscores why the the battle against malware and botnets may already be lost:

The total number of computers/users is 20,009, out of these 95.46% have 1 or more insecure applications installed on their computers - 95 out of a 100 computers that are connected to the Internet have insecure software installed.

Secunia explains "insecure application" as a software product for which a newer version is available to correct one or more vulnerable.

The company did not provide a breakdown of the unpatched apps that turned up the most. Instead, it simply highlighted the percentage of scanned machines with vulnerable applications installed.

Number of insecure applications per computer/user:

  • 0 Insecure Applications: 4.54% of computers
  • 0-5 Insecure Applications: 27.83% of computers
  • 6-10 Insecure Applications: 25.69% of computers
  • 11+ Insecure Applications: 41.94% of computers

  • Also see Andrew Garcia's take on the Secunia statistics.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack

    http://securitywatch.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12394

    Comments (1)

    EJ :

    This should be no surprise since botnets seem to have no problem getting recruits. What should be surprising, or maybe encouraging, or discouraging - who knows - is that someone who is expressing an interest in patching their PC would have so many patches missing.

    On the "no surprise" side, many times when I've used Secunia's PSI, it has uncovered not the obvious Windows patches that everyone should be applying, but uncovers the more obscure applications that have no automated way of being notified of available updates.

    At that point, it shouldn't be the users who are indicted, but the application vendors themselves that don't put "phone home" options in their applications to pick up updates as they become available.

    Post a Comment

     
     


    RSS Syndication
    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    Security Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
    Ziff Davis Enterprise

    Ziff Davis Enterprise Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters
    RSS Feeds | White Papers | ROI Calculators | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video |

    Baseline | Careers | Channel Insider | CIO Insight | DesktopLinux | DeviceForge | DevSource | eSeminars |
    eWEEK | LinuxDevices | Linux Watch | Microsoft Watch | Mid-market | Networking | PDF Zone |
    Publish | eWeek Security | Strategic Partner | Web Buyer's Guide | Windows for Devices

    Developer Shed | Dev Shed | ASP Free | Dev Articles | Dev Hardware | SEO Chat | Tutorialized | Scripts |
    Code Walkers | Web Hosters | Dev Mechanic | Dev Archives | IT Marketplace | igrep

    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

    Copyright ©1996-2007 Ziff Davis Enterprise, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Security Watch is a trademark of Ziff Davis Enterprise, Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Enterprise Inc. is prohibited.

    Ziff Davis Enterprise